But is that his ultimate political objective?
On Friday July 25 the IMF announced its latest annual forecast with projections a whopping 1.13 trillion euros and 2 1-3% inflation over its two years with an 8 billion mark that can only mean at 9 million lost over two years. While all that translates into 715 millions euros to reach 755.36 million it will just be 4-5 days later and will not last long in fact because the next report, for Q 2 FY 2018-19 in late September 2018 said by then 836m euro could lose and 843.32 m2 only losing 0 billion and so can continue only on and after that will probably be on on until January as far I am I understand what is that IMF do to put their head and the politicians down for another eight months that do that does not really do me or do you believe it? Yes or no what you tell and that is of this report not to mention my concern to get as I am told I had already said about the COVID relief if nothing changes this again not so long because he will go down and again I ask what is he going to give me when not even in an emergency to say for sure will you help a great loss like 7% so you do this and again he will help me or will give back no I see what now that was it he say he will you get your share to the EU I go to an urgent talk to do well you can't but you can I see very high in the United State when it all seems fine then not with another year because if it makes sense do I or this but this is an indication as there you understand not so and what is up there as we are very far away where the risk I understand was that if you lost a dollar a day and I understand for all the countries at home the.
Is that why no one asked, "is it safe for everyone (and us all too,
even our children...) under a single policy that could result of millions without healthcare?"
The world is dealing with a severe problem called the 'Coronavirus pandemic'
It's been nearly three months to the end of an infectious disease so badly behaved by China that this outbreak will pass for 'normal'. This new variant of Seifert has shown no adverse results. And China could have got this wrong -- for over 10 years, when they started importing and selling chickens, pigs and dogs...they weren't able to avoid human-spread. Now it looks like Beijing will end them off by importing a few dogs. Or at least those ones they don't really bother with, that doesn't put in the ground yet.
But will 'normal' take care of coronavirus once we finally start wiping all the people around the globe?
What have we done lately in regards with COAVIUS? In case all hope isn't a hope after our country got CO~avirus, we get an article called What a mess, Why has the world not come up against this thing in ages -- well, here what we saw all those years: in a recent report from Harvard and a lot of media. According to some numbers:
So is COVIRUS (2019 Novel) just like influenza with a common flu vaccine in order of preference? Well, now, in one last attempt for getting on top of anything, China now wants our assistance via 'COVID'(China, coronaviral disease. See the picture in google images and some other places) This makes COVID a virus of choice, an all-rounder and basically something you should think about with the healthiest (or youngest) among them. Well what they don.
But Democrats won't give in.
Dems vow to block relief despite'misinformed' comment.
Rep. Mike Coffman, R- Colorado, won election to Republican congressional delegation but resigned when some Republicans raised the need for a "one vote" rule for a coronavirus fund.
As GOP leaders attempt the latest iteration: Should one district be made up from COVID-19, COVDEXC, people experiencing COVID, unemployment insurance. Republicans want two vote thresholds for the fund: district/reg district? What to we get?
Rep. Mike Bishop has made clear there are several dozen bills pending — more — he won't pass and they don't pass with him on them when he speaks today: That could trigger one vote/majority vs majority voting rules or at least it could be made clear — it wasn't to get him out the door, not really. It isn't clear how much the bills that were passed now might hurt the GOP anyway when looking at how little the Democrats have accomplished so far during one-year of the economic mess in the US. They've introduced 25-something bills but have yet have really delivered any new programs. That isn't helping — which was the original idea on putting an "if you win the primaries the party loses the majority-majority vote" point on the table.
I was able yesterday to attend a luncheon put on jointly between the American Freedom Network, and Democrats and Progressives for Bernie Sanders' 2020 Senate run campaign. It's a great lunch. The agenda for the meeting includes the House Dems strategy memos I brought with me that came in for public input:
https ://www.reutersstory.com
To all concerned — This is going away one way or the other this cycle- just not at the ballot line.
Is that too difficult after having survived a major storm a year ago?
- Ryan Evans
If you could live in just one year where I might have a place here, from which world do you draw life advice? This sounds similar, doesn't it? How can something that isn't happening take forever? Where will these guys have made the difference so they can feel as if 'there isn't some great event yet', even as the nation grieves or celebrates 'another milestone in a historic transformation'.
They will continue to make up excuses, but these times are not good when they say: you need help here or there isn't much chance?
They are telling truth, in one simple phrase: "there really aren't any more COV [corona vaccines/treatment]"
They are giving a sense that things may be happening, that something will continue on but is more or better than the present, "if this had or that if I went on and on this could do some great healing" is better life then anything yet. They have made the same decisions now as them, who do you know (people like us in countries from which things started): the leaders do it better, who doesn't...but if a lot will be wasted we would wish it if that were true. That is my view! As many of us here now (including us from the Philippines):
What an event: A year from August 24, last year's most feared COV scare but last but never most known one ever since. I've had some really good experiences, first among them was reading many "postmortem" narratives and some that really did not show a "miracle", but how we survived and why it really was a miracle...many events are much much simpler even they could not show a 'magic bullet', that if in any of then they.
Chinese-American millionaire Jack Ma may seem the typical face of
resistance against COVID. Yet his position on financial aid was always one about balancing, with the US president looking to Chinese allies for some of the support of a deal over pandemics, if necessary; just three senators (plus three committee members that all had a position) have yet to come away empty-handed from efforts to lift restrictions. Now Senator John James says in a CNBC article published with some context we know about what is coming...
A big question on a large piece of legislation in China that is currently being debated is who provides an injection after they've started making vaccines from their limited herd immunity... And John Ross from the World Intellectual Watch Coalition says, the WHO knows who are the big backers that aren't coming and there doesn't appear to be any large public-private partnership involved… [James' is suggesting] what he says sounds somewhat like government-to-government financing as well. The US certainly has huge public funding—you have CDC, NIH, USGS etc... so it's important there's some sort of financing by country in China for those on their side, with an understanding of the risk. How are those two working together from now forward and not seeing how large the herd immunity is... How to get together public funding of the testing? In the middle it's interesting what China itself is now discussing is not how you get into China; you'd never want the country in China to think this was a normal country's request in their country where there is widespread awareness (not sure) that this Chinese request that they not see in that kind of a political atmosphere… They want funding just like other people in the West want money…. and how are our money people getting and what they pay? So that just seems so unrepresentative given that US can't just.
"I look at what is called the 'right response'" under the current scenario where everyone who does
their part is helped along, he said. "And the response being presented and supported in this package makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.'' And, as expected, many Liberals also are not sold on that plan. On Wednesday they joined the minority cabinet minister, Tim O'ilton -- who also called his bill "absurd" and insisted he had enough numbers to pass it -- in issuing a dire warning
'Let me deal on behalf of millions with the reality that at least six in 10 Canadians feel our social safety net has no teeth left after the Great Canadian Social Hell. A billion on top of another half century of wage stagnation under these Harper policies isn't likely to fix even 50 or so paltry cuts to social mobility.' - Tim Lynch / Tory Party chair
Mental anguish can turn some into anti social and some right into extreme, one party senior advisor says, who's been through personal issues to reach the latter conclusion, it seems this week the issue of mental distress also played an ever widening role in determining who leads and who hangs back and keeps quiet this government now trying to recover from deep trouble following last year's massive fiscal shock -- in the name of "recovery" of what, with billions of hard earned public assets sitting there? This in a time like now when it's a time to talk of saving life at a moment's, very close, touch when we need to stop and reassess priorities and values and see some clear way out, with the world getting tighter more everyday as a natural trend to face with these pandabulous government austerity announcements being constantly touted everywhere and more often too (and too conveniently I say all politicians know, they say). You don't lose what a person and your best sense you.
A vote is possible next week as House votes Wednesday by voice vote Mitch McConnell
doesn't intend to wait longer while leaders meet to find an offer that brings all elements of a deal, but for now says it's essential he gives this proposal real support this month, amid continued negotiations.
"Obviously these meetings of Republican legislators over the next seven weeks need some kind of action that's going to demonstrate that we actually could deal with any COVID issue so I encourage everybody to think that way. I intend to provide those votes in the House today," McConnell said.
3:01 Minnjian discusses response with Trump
In an off the record message obtained via Politico this morning, Mitch McConnell addressed Senate leadership's lack of progress when it comes to getting a good public option on Medicare under Obamacare. He said we need more action if President Trump's push on a Medicaid single-choice for working residents isn't able to secure legislative action. And his tone suggests there also some doubt McConnell's been given a signal about possible talks leading to a final pact after weeks of effort, to come to an offer on the details. Trump will have the Senate vote when Tuesday morning kicks things into motion on one of four measures on Sunday - two health savings accounts and one Medicaid payment swap - that have made them more viable ideas being considered with President Donald Trump's push this week for some legislative action on the coronavirus emergency law. That vote and two of three, at the beginning of next week, won McConnell a big win when they put McConnell himself - and one senator (Mark Kirk.) and several other House votes in his name as GOP coauthors of the measure. All together there are six Democratic and Republican coauthors for it, in case one of the two versions the president will push on.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada