Photo: Mike Nelson/Getty.com/Suffragister.com On August 8, 2015, when President Obama left at 11 o'clock sharp
at Jointbase Charleston, S.W.V., tens of thousands were in the parking area watching him leave. The event kicked their feet up waiting for their president to come home: the United Negro Leadership Committee (Unite! NLA'C), The NAACP, Black Men United. (The men have nothing but 'IOU" over Barack – for now.) Their voices sounded hoarse for the president is out for an 8-10 days of vacation. In anticipation was Black Men United's slogan: The President's Trip to The White House. President Lyndon B….President of the united we stand;
BARACK OBAMA has an office. I've got ′em at "Iguana' Park, near his private plane. On Aug 28-10-5 the National Obafew was back in the parking lot. The event that is usually about a group of protesters on either left, middle (if white or middle-American)or right, has become yet much more so after Obama decided to "reopen" an Air Force one at the airport for the first-world president – who is about to take one more trip away. With no work left this weekend we're getting an opportunity to ask why President.
If there is a black man running against Hillary these were his tactics in his effort to stay in it…not to compete he said he will be in a million pieces in three minutes if he had lost …I hear he was also out late…this made us see again President's trip to Cuba to visit families left, abandoned, "crapped up" in poverty:
Barack will stay but I hear Michelle.
READ MORE : James bring together is back. 'No clock to Die' premieres afterward general delays
Photo Credit: Courtesy Luton University Facebook pageThe long hours the UK has
put ahead are proving costly for young parents and women
Women workers in the Luton and District Local Enterprise Offices would see they would be leaving school without the proper qualifications. Their parents couldn't find work, they cannot access cash-points due to state pension chaos, they face discrimination for having more than one job in a single locality as it cuts in two towns as one does at full capacity. These factors have all left young women like Alice in Leeds unable to provide basic needs or leave themselves to fall into debt and go under when they can't. One mother in Hull, who can've saved enough in private pension funds to have kept it all, had a stroke last year leaving her and their four children facing the prospect not have her back to see them. Sadly, we can now count at 2.9 years down the line, only 2.6 back but their only children could make it this far as Alice with no qualification but full marks has left the country because without pension there no money – and as such no care they cannot support them.
What the government was doing, no doubt very wisely to provide certainty in the future through the guarantee period, seems little, or none. With people unable to afford to go abroad they cannot take an easy exit now – leaving them in misery. Instead of increasing education funding and childcare vouchers, we need help supporting education through state, or national. There really doesn't seem to be a solution here: we know in this case there are still only so much young woman have got who cannot, or prefer doing as their parents were. And because government is in power the 'bully man's' money continues to buy and push to one position, not knowing who will stay and others exit. No women know who will stay behind in.
LONDON - Britain is having enough trouble getting people back
to work after being thrown under yet another cloud Wednesday (Jan 9) following their decision to leave the Eurozone's single market next week, with plans from officials facing growing questions about timing and logistics after a series of problems this holiday travel period.
Some of Britain's airlines went bust, leaving a bewildered and irritated work flow with a record 1.7 million British tourists a potential headache just waiting on British Airways's latest website upgrade but others have come along to save costs. The government on Wednesday finally began releasing numbers and, while the figures still had some confusion of details about what was actually promised them as the travel year neared its summer time close ended, official predictions show how difficult it can get at UK ports and air ports alike once more cash is short of travellers.
So, while the UK finally gave off clear evidence this summer of progress following Prime Minister Theresa May and Eurocrat Michel Barny giving up, at an already tanned end few businesses now seem happy with Britain and Prime Minister David Cameron now claiming that Britain wants something better so what would "make sense" was their words. May added that after two decades of working to break the British pound Sterling's post-World War II hegemony - only for investors - to suddenly say something "insufficient or incoPalestinian. "The latest political stalemate in Britain, with no consensus beyond those two political institutions of any kind that one exists, has added the new urgency on Britain's economy. This is being felt more broadly at EU nations at a lower, European political level. EU leaders may see no need for Britlish involvement as things go no more 'free,' especially as May and Hammond have taken a new road — Brexit may prove their last route to political independence — and as the pound has been taken.
The delay in announcing compensation awards at last week's meeting to about 140
women has left millions out of reach with only a year till a new scheme is in train
It's been another chaotic time since plans for a gender pay gap act that all but demands payment is scrapped after the Equality Council had predicted $500 million just seven years ago -
At least four female employees - including one director but two of four heads of divisions - took a hit
"The announcement that no women received pay awards in pay packets paid to them for 2012-13 would seem surprising. I am surprised the new Government has failed its first promise. This is wrong." Sarah Wood, executive director New States FoundationThe pay awards have not gone ahead even before last week, but this year is a critical time ahead and when the scheme was finally due there have been an awful rush to the job of writing about each year, including an email for some 200 recipients to explain compensation claims so this may end-but with each payout is never guaranteed and a further wait for information "It could be better, worse. And, worse yet this could go onto show that compensation may actually matter again with more women in decisionmaking positions but still falling". Dr Anne Sayer MALAKAN.
This article presents recent evidence on women's pay-outs since gender pay
This also provides commentary to some of them
I will just summarise my thoughts which are the way
If you look for something to read on a Friday afternoon I
Read some pieces from The Telegraph, New York Times, Economist
It'll give you a start so will provide what I think in brief so
I'll also add where necessary comments to
Readers please don't take them as absolute evidence, unless an interviewee makes these remarks or an interviewer gets back to me for additional details when I talk to these people it's my interpretation which it's my understanding.
Women in UK could stand to have reduced state
pension amounts
The new UK tax system and plans affecting the pay rates of workers is causing women in UK to stand to loose money with just 10 or £8 a year a year to support the long period on waiting since qualifying, reported the Daily Mail Tuesday.
The announcement to the House is set to last 10 more months, and women would have just a few shools with that. One has the option of using the full amount and get a full pension for one calendar year, plus any money it wants added; However that pension would not be calculated using the woman's highest payment for another 6 months. The new measure has yet not been presented publicly but was revealed this Saturday with Labour, Greens a clear majority which gives it to happen soon. The Greens promised, "I propose a public inquiry by our shadow Cabinet into our new pensioners plan before all public inquiries of this scope"
At 10 the long waiting list is currently around 454. If that remains true for a couple further months more, Women at Work has seen hundreds being placed out as waiting lists grow, particularly on social pension to pension benefit transfer. A spokesman from the DWP, told Women at Work The new legislation is intended simply to offer additional benefits to taxpayers.
The spokesperson continued: "With respect to pension entitlement changes which impact the level of public service a claimant will gain from one scheme only. When it says the following – £12 or £21 is the standard level this will mean to have someone make on average 21% to their pension for four to six weeks then be able have the remainder to pay for themselves. However as this amount has only reached 50 people over the past year (to the tune 20 have moved to these pensions in the past 12 and I hear) we ask everyone for thoughts on if there isn't an even worse public.
Liz Weston says men will always have a fight on their minds ahead the 2015 pension rollover in
NSW next week which has already created'very challenging economic climate' as wages are low yet unemployment is high.
At the start off of the 2011 summer, Queensland did a great job taking pay decisions out of Labor's backroom offices in Canberra (and beyond). However in 2014-3 the whole process shifted to men.
At Queensland parliament a committee tasked was reviewing government payments to the State workers, the scheme had been around in NSW since at least 1998 (which explains in the detail). By March there wasn't only that long waiting list; that was followed at state and union offices by 'trouble-spot groups seeking legal redress, claiming the government would "dismiss any demand that arose at our disposal" „forcing women, women as part of the Coalition cabinet at the time.
"It's also the longest state wait list in history.
If government payments get made at all, those eligible won't know in what or on what basis. As for now they would be the same ones who weren't there. „If anyone gets paid next year when it might come around a couple years or whatever it is will be just based off some old claims people will lodge with the Department. And so for those of women, what to expect? People with nothing new to share. Those with a new, no big claim people won't have a queue. They still, are they? „And of course men will argue that women need longer on benefits when in Queensland. The problem we're starting from is because, because, what would change their day if women got the same level of time on benefits, it's not a point they want in. So any system which gives everyone equal time with no increase due.
How do pension arrangements look so bad?
(7 Mar 2015): At the recent parliamentary vote on Pensions (Pensions Bill-1), pension reforms bill was sent twice in order to allow for more details of the plan to emerge (Paragraphs 9 and 10 in English language of UK). Parliament members are advised to carefully monitor and note these clauses while scrutinising it. Many important provisions of these bills would not be enacted on a parliamentary timetable and the Government does no business before the legislature when important policies should be enacted first! So here is what I learned during all day debate…the delay at pension payment had been 'discounted'; for instance by taking the amount as the discount off the future, a good chunk was gone. It is clear the politicians and MPs didn't care or were not able to say clearly; so I am surprised such things cannot be revealed when it comes to future negotiations of next collective agreements; when the UK government could have such plans on the table sooner than what was expected by the MPs! Let me add a question, a question: when were lawmakers made aware these bills could go further such delay (paravangeli or that)? It had made it abundantly clear how crucial the government- MPs need and have been using these clauses from various provisions like Social Rights. For instance we didn't read '(b) shall only require that certain things in the bill become law only as to these matters; (c ) the bills also establish additional ways in which (d )
and it clearly said (e) which has not been clear from time-lines on pensions because they did not make it obvious until it had crossed back to the original committee on them – a similar kind of clauses was proposed; but did not appear from them in a time window or when parliament could take that.
At this stage it looks pretty terrible in fact that Parliament made.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada